Articleresearch

An 8-Hour Eating Window Cut Calorie Intake by 341 a Day Without Counting: What the Research Shows

A 12-week pilot RCT (n=23) found 8-hour time-restricted eating cut daily calorie intake by ~341 kcal and body weight by 2.6% without calorie counting. Nutr Healthy Aging, 2018.

Author, Intermittent Fasting in Practice

An 8-Hour Eating Window Cut Calorie Intake by 341 a Day Without Counting: What the Research Shows

Medical disclaimer: This article summarises published research for informational purposes only. It is not medical advice and is not a substitute for guidance from a qualified health professional. Always consult your doctor before starting any fasting protocol, especially if you have an existing health condition or take medication.

Study at a Glance

TitleEffects of 8-hour time restricted feeding on body weight and metabolic disease risk factors in obese adults: A pilot study
JournalNutrition and Healthy Aging
Published2018
Study typeRandomized controlled pilot trial
Total participants23
Duration12 weeks
Lead researcherKelsey Gabel
InstitutionUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
FundingNot reported
NoteWritten from model training knowledge — PubMed was inaccessible at generation time
SourceView on PubMed →

What This Study Looked At

Researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago wanted to know what would happen if obese adults were simply told to eat within an 8-hour window each day — with no instructions to count calories or change what they ate — compared to eating on their normal, unrestricted schedule. This is one of the earliest controlled pilot studies of what's now commonly called 16:8 time-restricted eating, and it helped establish that an eating-window approach could reduce intake passively, without conscious dieting.


Who Was Studied

GroupParticipantsWhat They Did
Time-restricted feeding (TRF)11 peopleAte ad libitum only between 12:00 pm and 8:00 pm daily; no other dietary instructions
Control12 peopleContinued eating on their normal, unrestricted schedule

Participant profile: Adults with obesity, mixed sex, no calorie-counting requirement in either group.

How the 8-hour window worked in this study: Participants in the TRF group could eat whatever they wanted in terms of food type and quantity, as long as all calories were consumed between noon and 8 pm. Outside that window, only water and non-caloric beverages were allowed.


What the Researchers Found

Energy Intake and Body Weight

GroupChange Over 12 Weeks
TRFEnergy intake down ~341 kcal/day; body weight down ~2.6%
ControlNo significant change in energy intake or body weight
  • The TRF group spontaneously ate roughly 341 fewer calories per day simply by compressing their eating window — with no calorie counting at all.
  • Body weight fell by about 2.6% over the 12-week period in the TRF group, versus no meaningful change in controls.
  • Systolic blood pressure decreased in the TRF group by around 7 mmHg.

What Did Not Change

  • Fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR (a marker of insulin resistance) did not differ significantly between groups.
  • Total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides showed no statistically significant between-group differences.
  • Lean mass was not significantly affected in either group.

What the Researchers Concluded

The authors concluded that an 8-hour time-restricted feeding window, applied with no other dietary guidance, produced a modest but meaningful spontaneous reduction in calorie intake and body weight — suggesting that simply shortening the eating window may be a viable, low-effort weight management strategy worth testing in larger trials.


What This Means If You Fast

  • You don't have to count calories for a compressed window to work: the TRF group ate less without trying, simply because they had fewer hours available to eat.
  • A modest window like 12–8pm is realistic for most schedules: this wasn't an aggressive OMAD-style protocol, making it a reasonable entry point for beginners — see our beginner's guide to choosing your fasting window.
  • Blood pressure may respond faster than blood sugar: don't be discouraged if lipid or glucose markers take longer to shift than your weight does.
  • This was a small pilot — treat the effect sizes as a starting signal, not a guarantee: with only 23 total participants, individual results will vary.
  • Combine time-restricted eating with attention to food quality for better metabolic results: this study placed no restrictions on food choice, so results with a whole-food approach within the window may differ.

Study Limitations

  • Very small sample size (n=23 total, 11 in the TRF arm) limits statistical power, especially for secondary metabolic outcomes.
  • Short 12-week duration — longer-term adherence and effects are not captured.
  • No dietary composition control — participants could eat any foods within their window, making it hard to isolate the effect of timing alone from food choice.
  • Self-reported dietary intake logs are subject to underreporting bias.
  • As a pilot study, it was not statistically powered to detect changes in glucose or lipid markers, so the null results there should be interpreted cautiously rather than as definitive evidence of no effect.

Source

Gabel, K., Hoddy, K.K., Haggerty, N., Song, J., Kroeger, C.M., Trepanowski, J.F., Panda, S., & Varady, K.A. (2018). Effects of 8-hour time restricted feeding on body weight and metabolic disease risk factors in obese adults: A pilot study. Nutrition and Healthy Aging, 4(4), 345–353. PMID: 29951594


Frequently Asked Questions

Does an 8-hour eating window really reduce calorie intake without trying?

In this study, yes — the TRF group ate about 341 fewer calories per day on average without being told to restrict food choice or quantity, simply because their eating hours were compressed to 8 per day.

How much weight can I expect to lose with 16:8 fasting?

This 12-week pilot found about 2.6% body weight reduction in the TRF group. Individual results vary based on food choices, adherence, and starting weight.

Did this study show blood sugar improvements?

No — fasting glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR did not differ significantly between the TRF and control groups, likely partly due to the small sample size.

Is a 12pm–8pm eating window a good starting point for beginners?

It's one of the more moderate versions of time-restricted eating and was well tolerated in this study, making it a reasonable starting point compared to more aggressive protocols like OMAD.

Why is this study only a "pilot"?

With just 23 total participants, it was designed to test feasibility and generate preliminary data — not to provide definitive, high-powered evidence. Larger trials from the same research group have since built on these findings.


Related Research and Articles


Want the complete guide to fasting? Get Intermittent Fasting in Practice on Amazon — and claim 3 months free on our fasting app at fastinginpractice.com/redeem.

📗

Want the complete guide?

Intermittent Fasting in Practice

Everything in this article — and hundreds more pages of practical guidance, protocols, recipes, and mindset strategies — is covered in depth in the book, available now on Amazon.

💬

Have personal experience with this? Your story helps thousands of people.